Book Review/Essay 2/97(revised 1/29/02 - maps added at bottom)(revised 6/25/03 - map of Angola superimposed on the US)Michael Crichtons 1980 pulp novel Congo opens with an introduction that is truly arresting . I quote here the first two paragraphs in their entirety.
This reader was gripped by his own ignorance of the facts and yet skeptical. He could recall all those geography lessons of grade school. He had traveled a bit. But none of this brought enough confidence to bear for these first two paragraphs in this pulp novel not to send him off to his maps, atlases, encyclopedias, even the internet. Mercator. Yes, that is the projection so familiar from grade school. It even sticks in the mind that one of its key features is that the latitude and longitude lines are straight lines. This is convenient for rectangular pieces of paper, but it creates great distortions of area. This rectangular display of the surface of the nearly spherical surface of the earth produces a Greenland that appears almost as large as the US. The farther away you go north or south from the equator the larger this error becomes. So, OK this Mercator, who on investigation in the 97 Grolier CD Encyclopedia, turns out to be a Flemish cartographer, Gerardus Mercator (1512-1594), produced cylindrical projections of a spherical surface. This of course lead to this readers present state of misapprehension. Well, lets take a closer look at this matter. A few simple comparisons of territories that he has driven across will put this into better perspective (this reader does have a bit of trouble with abstractions). So here is a chart neatly drawn up in tabular form (again courtesy of the above referenced CD encyclopedia). The data on Africa seems to hold up Crichtons assertions. Hopefully the American reader (obviously of the East Coast persuasion) will find some suitable reference point to investigate the data for themselves. The India entry is just for fun and effect.
What strikes this parochial mind is that the Mercator effect is at work even in our views of the United States. Lets investigate this a bit. First a couple of numbers to illustrate my thesis. Texas is 801 miles north to south and 773 miles east to west. By contrast, think of a car trip from Boston to Chicago. The
American Automobile Association preferred yellow-line triptych
calls this out at 925 miles. Boston to Washington DC is approximately
600 miles. Do these numbers and our mental images on the map
jive? Let me close this bit of geography with a historical note about Vietnam. During the Vietnam War I found it useful in political discussions, during my college days in Wisconsin, to point out that Vietnam is very close to the combined land area of the states of Wisconsin and Illinois . In this area the US government dropped as much munitions as consumed during all of World War II in all theaters.
6/25/3 Yesterday I was scanning through the New York Times and saw an article, "Latest Peace Hopes Thwarted on Africa's Battlefields" by Somini Sengupta. It was accompanied by a series of maps, including this one: (text added by me)
|



